Posted on

Retiform Hemangioendothelioma of the Gluteal Region: A Case Report

Dr. Noora Saeed

By Dr. Noora Saeed

Dr. Noora Saeed is currently working as consultant pathologist in a reputed government hospital of India. She did her MBBS and MD Pathology from JNMC, Aligarh Muslim University (AMU).

Authors; Shagufta Quadri, Noora Saeed, Shaista M. Vasenwala, Hena A. Ansari. Originally published in the Saudi Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences 6(3): 165–168.

ABSTRACT

Retiform hemangioendothelioma is a locally aggressive, rarely metastasizing, low-grade angiosarcoma characterized by intercommunicating vascular channels lined by hobnail or cuboidal endothelial cells, flanked by lymphocyte and hyaline sclerosis. Neoplastic endothelial cells usually express von Willebrand factor, CD31 and CD34, while the lymphocytic infiltrate shows a mixture of CD3+, T and CD20+ B cells. The authors describe a case of a 76-year-old female who presented with a soft, painless, ill-defined mass measuring 9 cm in her right gluteal region for the past 15 years, clinically suggestive of a lipoma. There was no regional lymphadenopathy. The mass was resected and sent for histopathological examination. The slow-growing lesion and the typical histomorphology led to the diagnosis of retiform hemangioendothelioma. The diagnosis was confirmed by immunohistochemistry using CD34 antibody, which strongly stained the endothelial cells. The patient was followed up for 6 months after the surgery and no recurrence was noted.

INTRODUCTION

Retiform hemangioendothelioma (RH) was first elucidated in 1994 as a distinct vascular neoplasm of intermediate or borderline malignant potential and was classified as a low‑grade cutaneous angiosarcoma.[1] However, because of the infrequency with which RH is encountered, only tenuous and limited cases have been reported to date.

Here, the authors report a case of this rare vascular tumor, with a comprehensive literature review, succinctly describing the tumor and its management.

CASE REPORT

A  76‑year‑old  female  presented  to  the  outpatient Department of General Surgery at Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital (JNMCH), with a painless, ill‑defined swelling in the right gluteal region for the past 15 years. On local examination, the swelling measured 9 cm × 9 cm and was soft, nontender, not fixed and the overlying skin appeared normal. There was no regional lymphadenopathy, and the patient did not have any history of constitutional symptoms such as fever, weight loss or loss of appetite. The clinical picture was suggestive of lipoma. Complete blood count, urine analysis, liver and renal function test, including blood sugar and electrolytes, were within normal limits. Serological tests for HIV, hepatitis B and C were negative.

The mass was resected with a margin of 2 cm, encircling the lesion, and was sent for histopathological examination. On gross examination, it was found to be a nonencapsulated, solid, fatty growth measuring 7 cm × 6 cm × 4.5 cm, with intact skin that was received separately [Figure 1]. On cut section, a central hemorrhagic area of 3 cm was observed, surrounded by fibrofatty tissue. Histopathology revealed lobules of mature lipocytes separated by broad fibrous bands, containing numerous narrow arborizing vascular channels lined by hobnail endothelial cells and surrounded by dense lymphocytic infiltrate [Figures 2 and 3]. The endothelial cells showed focal papillary hyperplasia and mild nuclear atypia in some areas. Mitosis and necrosis were absent. The surgical resection margins were not involved.

Figure 1: Gross specimen showing a single nonencapsulated, irregular solid tissue measuring 7 cm × 6 cm × 4.5 cm

Figure 1: Gross specimen showing a single nonencapsulated, irregular solid tissue measuring 7 cm × 6 cm × 4.5 cm

Figure 2: Lobules of mature lipocytes separated by broad fibrous bands, containing numerous narrow arborizing vascular channels lined by hobnail endothelial cells, surrounded by dense lymphocytic infiltrate (H and E, ×40)

Lobules of mature lipocytes

Figure 3: Endothelial cell lining the vascular channel, showing hobnailing (H and E, ×400)

Figure 3: Endothelial cell lining the vascular channel, showing hobnailing (H and E, ×400)

The typical histomorphology supported the diagnosis of RH, which was confirmed by immunohistochemistry with CD34 antibody [Figure 4], which strongly stained the endothelial cells. During the 6 months of follow‑up after surgery, no recurrence was noted.

Figure 4: Immunohistochemistry using CD34 antibody strongly stained the endothelial cells (CD34, ×40)

Figure 4: Immunohistochemistry using CD34 antibody strongly stained the endothelial cells (CD34, ×40)

DISCUSSION

RH was first described by Calonje et al.[2] in 1994 as a rare, locally aggressive vascular neoplasm. To date, only 32 cases of this tumor have been reported in the literature.[3] In 2005, Tan et al.[4] reported 24 RH cases, of which 16 occurred in the extremities, 5 in the trunk and 1 case each in the scalp, skull and penis. Bhutoria et al.[5] reported another case of RH associated with lymph node metastasis and tumor recurrence.

RH has been subtyped as an intermediate (i.e., rarely metastasizing) vascular tumor, according to the World Health Organization’s classification of soft tissue tumor. Lesions can be either single or multiple and are commonly seen in middle‑aged adults, with the mean age being the fourth decade. There is a female preponderance for the development of RH, with a female to male ratio of 2:1.[6] The tumor mainly presents as a slow‑growing, ill‑defined mass, nodule or plaque involving the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the extremities, with rarer sites being the scalp, pinna, neck, trunk and penis.[2,7,8] The patient in this case report was an elderly female presenting with an ill‑defined swelling in the gluteal region.

Microscopically, the tumor is typified by elongated, anastomosing vascular channels, extending between the collagen bundles in a retiform fashion and flanked by lymphocytes and hyaline sclerosis. These vessels are lined by a single layer of cuboidal‑appearing endothelial cells with a characteristic hobnail morphology.[9,10] The lining endothelial cells are characterized by a high nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio and an apically placed nucleus that produces a surface bulge. However, dissection of collagen bundles by small groups of  endothelial cell, peculiar to conventional angiosarcoma, is not a feature of RH. The absence of atypical mitosis and necrosis also helps differentiate RH from invasive malignancy. Similarly, the case described here also demonstrated a fibrous band containing delicate arborizing vascular channels lined by a single layer of hobnail endothelium with mild nuclear atypia. Necrosis or increased/atypical mitosis was not found.

Clinical differential diagnosis of RH includes other vascular tumors such as papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma (Dabska tumor), Kaposi hemangioendothelioma, epithelioid hemangioendothelioma and cutaneous angiosarcoma. Each of these neoplasms displays a unique histomorphology that helps in distinguishing them from each other. Dabska’s tumor consists of papillary tufts, with a central hyaline core lined by endothelial cells protruding into the lumina. Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma consists of glomeruloid structures alternating with slit‑like  spaces  containing  erythrocytes.  Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma consists of round to ovoid tumor cells arranged in cords, strands and solid nests embedded in a fibromyxoid or sclerotic stroma. Finally, cutaneous angiosarcoma consists of irregular sinusoidal neoplastic vascular channels invading the surrounding tissue along with cytological atypia, necrosis and numerous mitotic figures.[10]

Neoplastic endothelial cells in RH consistently express endothelial markers as von Willebrand factor, CD31 and CD34, while the lymphocytic infiltrate shows a mixture of CD3+, T and CD20+ B cells.[11] It has been observed that staining for CD31 and von Willebrand factor is significantly less intense than staining for CD34. In the case described here, the authors applied the antibody against CD34 on the tumor sections, which stained the endothelial cells. Surgical resection with microscopically tumor‑free margin is the treatment of choice for RH; however, it is associated with a high recurrence rate of up to 60%. Adjuvant radiotherapy has been effectively administered in few reported cases of RH that had been deemed unresectable or those having regional lymph node metastasis.[12] Follow‑up is essential in all patients.

CONCLUSION

This report describes a rare case  of  RH  occurring in an elderly female. The patient showed typical clinical and histomorphological features of RH; however, it is important for clinicians to distinguish RH from various differentials for an early intervention and appropriate management.

 

 

REFERENCES
  1. Calonje E, Fletcher CD, Wilson‑Jones E, Rosai Retiform hemangioendothelioma. A distinctive form of low‑grade angiosarcoma delineated in a series of 15 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 1994;18:115‑25.
  2. Kuo CL, Chen PC, Li WY, Chu Retiform hemangioendothelioma of the neck. J Pathol Transl Med 2015;49:171‑3.
  3. O’Duffy F, Timon C, Toner M. A rare angiosarcoma: Retiform haemangioendothelioma. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:200‑2.
  4. Tan D, Kraybill W, Cheney RT, Khour y T. Retifor m hemangioendothelioma: A case report and review of the literature.  J Cutan Pathol 2005;32:634‑7.
  5. Bhutoria B, Konar A, Chakrabarti S, Das Retifor m hemangioendothelioma with lymph node metastasis: A rare entity. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2009;75:60‑2.
  6. Bhat A, Narasimha A. Retiform haemangioendothelioma: Report of an uncommon Int J Curr Med Appl Sci 2016;11:104‑6.
  7. Choi WK, Lee SH, Oh SA, Kang Retiform hemangioendothelioma on the finger. Arch Plast Surg 2012;39:80‑2.
  8. Jothi EA, Sundaram M, Namasivayam J, Jothi A rare presentation of retiform hemangioendothelioma in the external auditory canal. Case Rep Otolaryngol 2014;2014:715035.
  9. Calonje Retiform haemangioendothelioma. In: Fletcher CD, Krishnan Unni K, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours, Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon: IARC Press; 2002. p. 165‑6.
  10. Weiss SW, Goldblum JR, editors. Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft Tissue 5th ed. China: Mosby Elsevier; 2008.
  11. Parsons A, Sheehan DJ, Sangueza Retiform hemangioendotheliomas usually do not express D2‑40 and VEGFR‑3. Am J Dermatopathol 2008;30:31‑3.
  12. Hirsh AZ, Yan W, Wei L, Wernicke AG, Parashar Unresectable retiform hemangioendothelioma treated with external beam radiation therapy and chemotherapy: A case report and review of the literature. Sarcoma 2010;2010. pii: 756246.